Revisions
Edited 1h ago by
doublestandards
@oldngray@wally said ↗@oldngray said ↗I read that it was 1 holdout juror preventing them from convicting. They will try her again but a waste of time and money. She should have been convicted the first time.Interesting I read the opposite, that it was one juror holding out and preventing a not guilty
Rendered before/after
Before
I read that it was 1 holdout juror preventing them from convicting. They will try her again but a waste of time and money. She should have been convicted the first time.
Interesting I read the opposite, that it was one juror holding out and preventing a not guilty
After
I read that it was 1 holdout juror preventing them from convicting. They will try her again but a waste of time and money. She should have been convicted the first time.
Interesting I read the opposite, that it was one juror holding out and preventing a not guilty