System maintenance completed. Please clear your browser cache and log in again.

Post history

View previous revisions and diffs for this post.
Hide history
Edited 2d ago by thebrownblob
@1030 said ↗If there is no enforcement mechanism how is it any different than when the company originally committed to creating the jobs?If they got UPS to agree that they can give these jobs at this point that would be a huge win because the company is admitting they can afford to do it. Last I heard they were hemming and hawing saying there wasn’t enough volume.They tried something similar in 1997 by the year 2000 they had been sued by the Teamsters and we won those jobs
Rendered before/after
Before

If there is no enforcement mechanism how is it any different than when the company originally committed to creating the jobs?

If they got UPS to agree that they can give these jobs at this point that would be a huge win because the company is admitting they can afford to do it. Last I heard they were hemming and hawing saying there wasn’t enough volume.


They tried something similar in 1997 by the year 2000 they had been sued by the Teamsters and won those jobs

After

If there is no enforcement mechanism how is it any different than when the company originally committed to creating the jobs?

If they got UPS to agree that they can give these jobs at this point that would be a huge win because the company is admitting they can afford to do it. Last I heard they were hemming and hawing saying there wasn’t enough volume.


They tried something similar in 1997 by the year 2000 they had been sued by the Teamsters and we won those jobs