The young and already overstimulated and desensitized killer wasn't upset at himself for falling for a transgender person. He was upset that Charlie was "hatefully" telling everyone that his boyfriend can never be a woman. Leftists believe that kind of speech is a violent attempt at trans erasure/genocide. And it gives them permission to "defend" them through the use of violence.
But he was a love torn child! 🤣🤣
The young and already overstimulated and desensitized killer wasn't upset at himself for falling for a transgender person. He was upset that Charlie was "hatefully" telling everyone that his boyfriend can never be a woman. Leftists believe that kind of speech is a violent attempt at trans erasure/genocide. And it gives them permission to "defend" them through the use of violence.
They don’t call us Nazis because they believe we’re Nazis, they call us Nazis so they can kill us.
Some people on the left were making fun of Charlie Kirk For saying that the threat of Gun death is worth keeping our second amendment. I don’t believe him being shot would’ve changed his opinion. Speech that is disliked and disagree about needs to be protected as well. It’s easy to keep speech that everyone likes, that’s not free speech
The first amendment is there precisely to protect speech we don’t like.
The young and already overstimulated and desensitized killer wasn't upset at himself for falling for a transgender person. He was upset that Charlie was "hatefully" telling everyone that his boyfriend can never be a woman. Leftists believe that kind of speech is a violent attempt at trans erasure/genocide. And it gives them permission to "defend" them through the use of violence.
Exactly my point and Pam missed the whole idea of free speech . The left says your speech insights violence simply by calling a man a man. So if the standard is, if it’s in sites violence when the left is in charge and you call someone their actual gender, you might be charged.
Exactly my point and Pam missed the whole idea of free speech . The left says your speech insights violence simply by calling a man a man. So if the standard is, if it’s in sites violence when the left is in charge and you call someone their actual gender, you might be charged.
The left says speech is violence. They have been peddling that narrative for years now.
Exactly my point and Pam missed the whole idea of free speech . The left says your speech insights violence simply by calling a man a man. So if the standard is, if it’s in sites violence when the left is in charge and you call someone their actual gender, you might be charged.
Yep. Huge fail for the political right. Can't tell the left that UK/Canada style curbs on "hate speech" would be stupid (they would be) and then have Trump's AG on camera calling for it word for word.
The left says speech is violence. They have been peddling that narrative for years now.
Yep, and apparently, Pam fell for it. This is exactly what they want. Especially when they have control. The same thing with red flag laws. They will say it’s just common sense lol yeah right we see what your “common sense” is.
Interesting no one ever points to Minnesota and the recent killings where they have red flag laws nothing happened there because red flag laws are really to punish people those in charge don’t like.
https://x.com/CollinRugg/status/1968392383080628238
This is the gentleman in the white hat some knuckleheads have been spreading conspiracy theory that was giving hand signals.
https://variety.com/2025/tv/news/nexstar-jimmy-kimmel-abc-charlie-kirk-1236522584/
ABC Pulls ‘Jimmy Kimmel Live!’ Indefinitely After Host’s Charlie Kirk Comments
"Disney’s ABC said it would take Jimmy Kimmel‘s popular late-night show off its schedule “indefinitely” after one of the biggest owners of TV stations in the U.S., Nexstar Media, said it intended to pre-empt airings of the program following remarks the host made about the killing of conservative activist Charlie Kirk.
Nexstar said Wednesday that its “owned and partner television stations affiliated with the ABC Television Network will preempt “Jimmy Kimmel Live!” for the foreseeable future, beginning with tonight’s show.” The company said it “strongly objects to recent comments made by Mr. Kimmel concerning the killing of Charlie Kirk and will replace the show with other programming in its ABC-affiliated markets.”
In his monologue Monday night , Kimmel said that the “MAGA gang” was trying to score political points off Kirk’s murder. Kirk, a prominent conservative activist, was shot and killed Sept. 10 at a debate at Utah Valley University. Three days later, authorities announced they had arrested the suspected shooter.
“We hit some new lows over the weekend with the MAGA gang trying to characterize this kid who killed Charlie Kirk as anything other than one of them,” Kimmel said."
https://variety.com/2025/tv/news/nexstar-jimmy-kimmel-abc-charlie-kirk-1236522584/
"Disney’s ABC said it would take Jimmy Kimmel‘s popular late-night show off its schedule “indefinitely” after one of the biggest owners of TV stations in the U.S., Nexstar Media, said it intended to pre-empt airings of the program following remarks the host made about the killing of conservative activist Charlie Kirk.
Nexstar said Wednesday that its “owned and partner television stations affiliated with the ABC Television Network will preempt “Jimmy Kimmel Live!” for the foreseeable future, beginning with tonight’s show.” The company said it “strongly objects to recent comments made by Mr. Kimmel concerning the killing of Charlie Kirk and will replace the show with other programming in its ABC-affiliated markets.”
In his monologue Monday night , Kimmel said that the “MAGA gang” was trying to score political points off Kirk’s murder. Kirk, a prominent conservative activist, was shot and killed Sept. 10 at a debate at Utah Valley University. Three days later, authorities announced they had arrested the suspected shooter.
“We hit some new lows over the weekend with the MAGA gang trying to characterize this kid who killed Charlie Kirk as anything other than one of them,” Kimmel said."
He sucked.
Candance Owens claims that the texts are fake.
She’s entitled to her opinion, but unless she has the receipt It’s only an opinion.
It really does sound fake though, it literally sounds like a cop wrote it, I’ve never heard a civilian, let alone a 20 something furry type to talk like that
“ I had planned to grab my rifle from my drop point shortly after, but most of that side of town got locked down. Its quiet, almost enough to get out, but theres one vehicle lingering.”
”drop point” “one vehicle lingering”
“I can get close to it but there is a squad car parked right by it. I think they already swept that spot, but I don't wanna chance it”
”squad car” “swept the spot”
“I'm wishing I had circled back and grabbed it as soon as I got to my vehicle”
”circled back to my vehicle”
“remember how I was engraving bullets? The [expletive] messages are mostly a big meme”
Remember how I was engraving bullets lol, not only does this sound just completley unnatural for a a young kid, I’ve never heard a gen z call it a “squad car” or say they need to get to their “vehicle”, but he also just happens to explain every single detail and all the evidence they have in one short exchange. He made a point to leave no evidence, but he wrote out every single detail immediately after shooting instead of just waiting to say in person once he got home to the person he lives with? Makes no sense and is super suspicious
The problem is his roommate gave the FBI his information supposedly. He’s going to have to refute it and so is the shooter because it’s evidence.
Personally, I think it is a forced note. I think they wrote this together and had this planned so that the roommate could pretend he didn’t know. Anything about the shooting. I believe this was their plan along with things got too crazy.
The problem is his roommate gave the FBI his information supposedly. He’s going to have to refute it and so is the shooter because it’s evidence.
Personally, I think it is a forced note. I think they wrote this together and had this planned so that the roommate could pretend he didn’t know. Anything about the shooting. I believe this was their plan along with things got too crazy.
The roommate had to know. Very likely they had a backup plan for him to squeal to the Feds if things went to hell.
The problem is his roommate gave the FBI his information supposedly. He’s going to have to refute it and so is the shooter because it’s evidence.
Personally, I think it is a forced note. I think they wrote this together and had this planned so that the roommate could pretend he didn’t know. Anything about the shooting. I believe this was their plan along with things got too crazy.
Writing it together could make more sense as that would be an explanation why it sounds so unnatural
shooter would be a bigger bitch than he already is if that’s the case than though lol, wonder how he’s get convinced to do that
The roommate had to know. Very likely they had a backup plan for him to squeal to the Feds if things went to hell.
Squealed like a pig….🤣
Log in to reply.
