Interesting… so in your scenario the post the employee made that was controversial but didn’t include ups logos, but their other posts did?
im not sure how I feel in that scenario, I can see both sides, what was your opinion on it?
here’s a link on the fed ex thing, you can see the picture in there he’s just wearing regular street clothes, I believe the internet just did their thing and tracked him down and found where he worked
his friend also got fired but he was a corrections officer, I can maybe see the reasoning there given the “conflict of interest” and being a government job or whatever but I don’t know I really don’t like the fed ex one and I don’t think it’s right and I think it’s a slippery slope
What we are talking about is much different than the government prosecuting someone for their speech.
If you associate yourself and you’re real identity, online with your employer, you’re asking for trouble.
What we are talking about is much different than the government prosecuting someone for their speech.
If you associate yourself and you’re real identity, online with your employer, you’re asking for trouble.
But what bout the fed ex driver? They didn’t associate with the company, people online tracked them down and linked them to their job
I just don’t like the idea of firing them for something they did off the clock that has nothing to do with their job performance, it’s none of the companies business IMO
This afternoon @RealCandaceO slandered me by accusing me of 'staging an intervention' with Charlie Kirk in which 'threats were made' with respect to his supposed 'evolving stance' on Israel at an event I hosted in the Hamptons. Candace also intimated that I 'blackmail[ed]'… https://t.co/mL6pajoX76
Since publishing, I've learned more from someone present at the Hamptons meeting:
"...Ackman convened the influencers under the auspices of a discussion about Zohran Mamdani and the supposed threat he posed to the West if elected mayor of New York. But the meeting went off the… https://t.co/WfNLPAZEgr
Again, as I said in my show today, this in no way implies that Israel had anything to do with Charlie’s assassination. What it does demonstrate is that they inexplicably moved to misrepresent his shifting viewpoint on Israel and the EXTREME pressure it put him under.
I have been asked about the Bill Ackman event more than a few times now so I asked our staff who were traveling with Charlie to find out what’s true and what’s not. His team was with him “100% of the time when he wasn’t in his hotel room.”
But what bout the fed ex driver? They didn’t associate with the company, people online tracked them down and linked them to their job
I just don’t like the idea of firing them for something they did off the clock that has nothing to do with their job performance, it’s none of the companies business IMO
But what bout the fed ex driver? They didn’t associate with the company, people online tracked them down and linked them to their job
I just don’t like the idea of firing them for something they did off the clock that has nothing to do with their job performance, it’s none of the companies business IMO
What about him? These people are at Will employees. If the company feels employing them hurt their business they are free to let them go. If anything this gives more value to being in the union.
I think most people with any political sense understand that there’s an Israel lobby.
Although all these postings you’re making makes me question you’re trying to get at? It doesn’t shock me that Israel was trying to manipulate Charlie Kirk to back tham 100% but it seems you’re trying to draw a parallel between him being killed by a teenager who is radicalized by on line communities and video game communities and some sort of Israel involvement. I don’t see it.
What about him? These people are at Will employees. If the company feels employing them hurt their business they are free to let them go. If anything this gives more value to being in the union.
I think most people with any political sense understand that there’s an Israel lobby.
Although all these postings you’re making makes me question you’re trying to get at? It doesn’t shock me that Israel was trying to manipulate Charlie Kirk to back tham 100% but it seems you’re trying to draw a parallel between him being killed by a teenager who is radicalized by on line communities and video game communities and some sort of Israel involvement. I don’t see it.
Just enjoy a good conspiracy, tried posting all sides, I’ll stop posting about it then I guess only post what I believe
Just enjoy a good conspiracy, tried posting all sides, I’ll stop posting about it then I guess only post what I believe
It’s cool you can post about it. I was just trying to figure out what you’re feeling on it was. I wasn’t aware it was a conspiracy.. It appears itwas a known fact that Charlie and the Israel lobby were at odds recently.
It’s cool you can post about it. I was just trying to figure out what you’re feeling on it was. I wasn’t aware it was a conspiracy.. It appears itwas a known fact that Charlie and the Israel lobby were at odds recently.
I also think these employees are free to get lawyers, but we both know they probably won’t. If you work in a right to work state without a union, you also have the right to get fired for just about any reason. Very difficult to fight.
It’s cool you can post about it. I was just trying to figure out what you’re feeling on it was. I wasn’t aware it was a conspiracy.. It appears itwas a known fact that Charlie and the Israel lobby were at odds recently.
There’s so many conspiracies about this right now lol, this is just the most mainstream since it has Candace Owens and she was so close to him so I felt it was safest to post haha
I don’t know what I think to be honest but I don’t believe the official narrative because it doesn’t make sense. I don’t understand why we don’t have any pictures of the guy with the gun, and them saying he disassembled the gun is weird too especially him then getting the hit in one shot with a just assembled scope
if anything I could see him being an unknowing patsy, or security purposely let him in, or something I don’t know, it’s just weird especially after the Trump shooting it’s just hard to believe another 20 something kid is successfully able to evade security and snipe at giant political figure ya know?
There’s so many conspiracies about this right now lol, this is just the most mainstream since it has Candace Owens and she was so close to him so I felt it was safest to post haha
I don’t know what I think to be honest but I don’t believe the official narrative because it doesn’t make sense. I don’t understand why we don’t have any pictures of the guy with the gun, and them saying he disassembled the gun is weird too especially him then getting the hit in one shot with a just assembled scope
if anything I could see him being an unknowing patsy, or security purposely let him in, or something I don’t know, it’s just weird especially after the Trump shooting it’s just hard to believe another 20 something kid is successfully able to evade security and snipe at giant political figure ya know?
or maybe it’s just Occam’s razor lol
I think this is coincidence, and the fact that most people in the United States have this entitled sense of safety at all times.
The reality is, that’s just not true. I think the kid got “dumb lucky”. It’s possible that someone let their guard down idk. Freedom is dangerous. I think Charlie understood that.
I think most people with any political sense understand that there’s an Israel lobby.
Although all these postings you’re making makes me question you’re trying to get at? It doesn’t shock me that Israel was trying to manipulate Charlie Kirk to back tham 100% but it seems you’re trying to draw a parallel between him being killed by a teenager who is radicalized by on line communities and video game communities and some sort of Israel involvement. I don’t see it.
Because there is no involvement. The idiot is stoned.
I think this is coincidence, and the fact that most people in the United States have this entitled sense of safety at all times.
The reality is, that’s just not true. I think the kid got “dumb lucky”. It’s possible that someone let their guard down idk. Freedom is dangerous. I think Charlie understood that.
The security at Kirk’s event is no where near the level of presidential.
