System maintenance completed. Please clear your browser cache and log in again.

Corner Irish Bar

cuntmo1 · 2025-08-03 21:20 · 561348 views


@badideaguy finally rolled on her. Smh


That looks awesome.

I'm officially still 12.


I'm gonna put so much money in my Cash Plus account

Dont forget i bonds Mother fucker


@badideaguy finally rolled on her. Smh

Jesus Christ.

Is that a dude or a chick???


That looks awesome.

I'm officially still 12.

And Bi curious…

Jesus Christ.

Is that a dude or a chick???


You tell me, Romeo


And Bi curious…

My ex has a picture of me wearing a sequin vest on new year's eve.

Closest you're gonna get... Lol.


@badideaguy finally rolled on her. Smh

This picture traumatized me


You tell me, Romeo

I can still make it work.


My ex has a picture of me wearing a sequin vest on new year's eve.

Closest you're gonna get... Lol.


You looked great! All be it a little faggy

Pasted image




B

@gumby

"Moreover, the

Court has already concluded that the balance of hardships does not favor issuance of an injunction.

In light of the Court’s analysis regarding these factors, it further concludes that the public interest

favoring arbitration of labor disputes, see Procter & Gamble, 864 F.2d at 930 n.3, is best served

here if the Court declines to grant the relief sought.

VI. Conclusion

For the foregoing reasons, the Court DENIES the Union’s motion for injunctive relief."


My ex has a picture of me wearing a sequin vest on new year's eve.

Closest you're gonna get... Lol.

What’s his name?

@gumby

"Moreover, the

Court has already concluded that the balance of hardships does not favor issuance of an injunction.

In light of the Court’s analysis regarding these factors, it further concludes that the public interest

favoring arbitration of labor disputes, see Procter & Gamble, 864 F.2d at 930 n.3, is best served

here if the Court declines to grant the relief sought.

VI. Conclusion

For the foregoing reasons, the Court DENIES the Union’s motion for injunctive relief."


Honestly its ashame this couldn't have been worked out on both sides
But as you well know ow the company wl do what it wants and grieve it later


I can still make it work.


Home schooled freak

@gumby

"Moreover, the

Court has already concluded that the balance of hardships does not favor issuance of an injunction.

In light of the Court’s analysis regarding these factors, it further concludes that the public interest

favoring arbitration of labor disputes, see Procter & Gamble, 864 F.2d at 930 n.3, is best served

here if the Court declines to grant the relief sought.

VI. Conclusion

For the foregoing reasons, the Court DENIES the Union’s motion for injunctive relief."

In short, @gumby, get the fuck out!



Honestly its ashame this couldn't have been worked out on both sides
But as you well know ow the company wl do what it wants and grieve it later

I’m sure you’re all broke up about it.

B
Pasted image


B
Pasted image


B

Buddy of mine....

Pasted image



Buddy of mine....

Pasted image


A/C finally?

Log in to reply.