System maintenance completed. Please clear your browser cache and log in again.

Post history

View previous revisions and diffs for this post.
Hide history
Edited 17h ago by boxox Silent
@badideaguy said ↗Your first argument was about military combatants, and then you shifted to economics.You went from sailors conditions to the price of gas.That's a bit of a shift.Our nearest naval supply base now being 2,000 miles away from the area of operations is part of our strategic loss. And yes, Iran did inflict that part of it militarily.Highmilitarily. High gas prices are also part of our strategic loss. The Iranian naval fleet now being submarines doesn't matter. They've still got plenty of missiles and drones.
Rendered before/after
Before

Your first argument was about military combatants, and then you shifted to economics.

You went from sailors conditions to the price of gas.

That's a bit of a shift.

Our nearest naval supply base now being 2,000 miles away from the area of operations is part of our strategic loss. And yes, Iran did inflict that part of it militarily.

High gas prices are also part of our strategic loss. The Iranian naval fleet now being submarines doesn't matter.


After

Your first argument was about military combatants, and then you shifted to economics.

You went from sailors conditions to the price of gas.

That's a bit of a shift.

Our nearest naval supply base now being 2,000 miles away from the area of operations is part of our strategic loss. And yes, Iran did inflict that part of it militarily.

High gas prices are also part of our strategic loss. The Iranian naval fleet now being submarines doesn't matter. They've still got plenty of missiles and drones.