System maintenance completed. Please clear your browser cache and log in again.

Post history

View previous revisions and diffs for this post.
Hide history
Edited 1h ago by wally Silent
@future said ↗The OP was caught up in the throes of tactical frivolity in the above post,post. weWe will grant him that, however, has he in his haste,haste committed an unintentional blunder?Let us review:Onlyblunder?Only four digits per hand...Notice the hands, just three fingers, plus the thumb tucked into the palm. The lone finger held in the upright position is only one of four the hand possesses.Since the hand pictured only has 4 total fingers, there is no middle finger. It fails in terms of the classical finger held up as a insult gesture.
Rendered before/after
Before

The OP was caught up in the throes of tactical frivolity in the above post. We will grant him that, however, has he in his haste committed an unintentional blunder?

1000015072.jpgOnly four digits per hand...

Notice the hands, just three fingers, plus the thumb tucked into the palm. The lone finger held in the upright position is only one of four the hand possesses.

Since the hand pictured only has 4 total fingers, there is no middle finger. It fails in terms of the classical finger held up as a insult gesture.


After

The OP was caught up in the throes of tactical frivolity in the above post, we will grant him that, however, has he in his haste, committed an unintentional blunder?

Let us review:

1000015072.jpgOnly four digits per hand...

Notice the hands, just three fingers, plus the thumb tucked into the palm. The lone finger held in the upright position is only one of four the hand possesses.

Since the hand pictured only has 4 total fingers, there is no middle finger. It fails in terms of the classical finger held up as a insult gesture.