Revisions
Edited 5mo ago by
thebrownblob
Some people on the left were making fun of Charlie Kirk For saying that the threat of Gun death is worth keeping our second amendment. I don’t believe him being shot would’ve changed his opinion. Speech that is disliked and disagree about needs to be protected as well.protected. It’s easy to keep speech that everyone likes, that’s not free speech
Rendered before/after
Before
Some people on the left were making fun of Charlie Kirk For saying that the threat of Gun death is worth keeping our second amendment. I don’t believe him being shot would’ve changed his opinion. Speech that is disliked and disagree about needs to be protected.
It’s easy to keep speech that everyone likes, that’s not free speech
After
Some people on the left were making fun of Charlie Kirk For saying that the threat of Gun death is worth keeping our second amendment. I don’t believe him being shot would’ve changed his opinion. Speech that is disliked and disagree about needs to be protected as well. It’s easy to keep speech that everyone likes, that’s not free speech