System maintenance completed. Please clear your browser cache and log in again.

Post history

View previous revisions and diffs for this post.
Hide history
Edited 2d ago by thebrownblob
@ovah said ↗Lol, they mad!!They have a point tho. This is something the membership wants.They could be mad, although none of them even know if they were going to get it. They’re not worried about the other people who’ve lost their jobs that aren’t drivers. There’s no guarantees anyone will be brought back from layoffs and layoffs won’t continue. And it can’t be stressed more that they’re asking the union to just look the other way on something that contractually the company was supposed to follow. Perhaps they should send a letter to the company to negotiate these contractually and with good faith?company?
Rendered before/after
Before




Lol, they mad!!

They have a point tho. This is something the membership wants.

They could be mad, although none of them even know if they were going to get it. They’re not worried about the other people who’ve lost their jobs that aren’t drivers. There’s no guarantees anyone will be brought back from layoffs and layoffs won’t continue. And it can’t be stressed more that they’re asking the union to just look the other way on something that contractually the company was supposed to follow.

Perhaps they should send a letter to the company?

After




Lol, they mad!!

They have a point tho. This is something the membership wants.

They could be mad, although none of them even know if they were going to get it. They’re not worried about the other people who’ve lost their jobs that aren’t drivers. There’s no guarantees anyone will be brought back from layoffs and layoffs won’t continue. And it can’t be stressed more that they’re asking the union to just look the other way on something that contractually the company was supposed to follow.

Perhaps they should send a letter to the company to negotiate these contractually and with good faith?