Revisions
Edited 6mo ago by
unionstrong
@thebrownblob said ↗Realistically, it would have to have been in the contract as not being allowed for it to be illegal. That is the standard now.It’s a contract,contract. notNot the constitution. If it’s not specifically allowed or forbidden, then that’s that.
Rendered before/after
Before
Realistically, it would have to have been in the contract as not being allowed for it to be illegal. That is the standard now.
It’s a contract. Not the constitution. If it’s not specifically allowed or forbidden, then that’s that.
After
Realistically, it would have to have been in the contract as not being allowed for it to be illegal. That is the standard now.
It’s a contract, not the constitution. If it’s not specifically allowed or forbidden, then that’s that.