System maintenance completed. Please clear your browser cache and log in again.

Post history

View previous revisions and diffs for this post.
Hide history
Edited 7d ago by thebrownblob
@johney said ↗Wasn't the whole buyout based on each centers needs as far as the company was concerned? So if they were short feeders in one building but fat RPCD in the same building RCPD got it? @wally said ↗No, but this is very different. The teamsters made a deal to let 7500 of its members take the buyout. Since this is national, across all buildings, centers, etc, teamsters seniority should rule.Too many high seniority in one location? Too bad UPS, not the unions problem.Is that what the agreement said or did you just make that up?Or did they agree to allow the company to use the seniority list as they always do?
Rendered before/after
Before


Wasn't the whole buyout based on each centers needs as far as the company was concerned? So if they were short feeders in one building but fat RPCD in the same building RCPD got it?

No, but this is very different. The teamsters made a deal to let 7500 of its members take the buyout.

Since this is national, across all buildings, centers, etc, teamsters seniority should rule.

Too many high seniority in one location? Too bad UPS, not the unions problem.

Is that what the agreement said or did you just make that up?

Or did they agree to allow the company to use the seniority list as they always do?

After

No, but this is very different. The teamsters made a deal to let 7500 of its members take the buyout.

Since this is national, across all buildings, centers, etc, teamsters seniority should rule.

Too many high seniority in one location? Too bad UPS, not the unions problem.

Is that what the agreement said or did you just make that up?

Or did they agree to allow the company to use the seniority list as they always do?