I wonder if these people who are claiming all these people are influencing people are the same Jack wagons who told me subliminal messages were in albums in the 70s andOzzy Osbourne was going to cause me to commit suicide or that video games we’re going to destroy my life in the 80s?
Really feels like the same thing here.
Maybe some people are just idiots and some people are just awful people and it really doesn’t have anything to do with Sup influencers?
Advertising does work man, there’s a reason @badideaguy is putting ads on the site, because they help pay the bills, and they’re not giving money out of the goodness of their hearts, they’ve found the return on investment is positive, and same goes for people paying the media and influencers
Advertising does work man, there’s a reason @badideaguy is putting ads on the site, because they help pay the bills, and they’re not giving money out of the goodness of their hearts, they’ve found the return on investment is positive, and same goes for people paying the media and influencers
This is such a bunch of bull crap!!
Now, if you excuse me, I’m on my way to Taco Bell for fiesta taco and Baja blast Mountain Dew!!
I'd guess it was for scope installation/adjustment.
Most scopes have hand adjustable turrets but maybe he had detached the scope for transport and needed to screw them back on. There are quicker and easier ways to mount a scope but older rings used screws.
🚨 BREAKING: Charlie Kirk assassin Tyler Robinson appears to have CONFESSED to friends in a Discord chat shortly before turning himself in, per WaPo
“Hey guys, I have bad news for you all. It was me at UVU yesterday. im sorry for all of this. im surrendering through a sheriff… pic.twitter.com/WFckZ5FphY
Didn't look like that rifle could be broken down. Mauser action with a full size stock. He could remove the action from the stock though I guess. It would still be hard to conceal.
Didn't look like that rifle could be broken down. Mauser action with a full size stock. He could remove the action from the stock though I guess. It would still be hard to conceal.
Last I heard, the rifle we saw wasn’t the one used.
that wouldn’t make sense though because the picture the fbi posted of the gun in the woods it was all put together, that would mean he took the rifle apart, brought it to the roof, put it back together, did the shooting then took it back apart, brought it to the woods and put it back together before ditching it.
also wouldn’t taking the scope off mess with the accuracy and need to be re zeroed? Since he got it in one shot I’d figure he didn’t do that
Last I heard, the rifle we saw wasn’t the one used.
That was a big question mark for me. He wasn't seen carrying the rifle as he ran away from the roof. Which also brings up the question of if he used another rifle what happened to it?
That was a big question mark for me. He wasn't seen carrying the rifle as he ran away from the roof. Which also brings up the question of if he used another rifle what happened to it?
I don't think we're ever going to get all the answers to this situation. You know?
That was a big question mark for me. He wasn't seen carrying the rifle as he ran away from the roof. Which also brings up the question of if he used another rifle what happened to it?
It is weird that there is a video of him on the roof but no videos or pictures or of him on the roof with the gun. I haven’t see any picture at all with him carrying the gun, which is strange with how many cameras are out there
Attorney General Pam Bondi: "There's free speech and then there's hate speech, and there is no place, especially now, especially after what happened to Charlie, in our society...We will absolutely target you, go after you, if you are targeting anyone with hate speech." pic.twitter.com/Bqj6TQOGwP
Attorney General Pam Bondi: "There's free speech and then there's hate speech, and there is no place, especially now, especially after what happened to Charlie, in our society...We will absolutely target you, go after you, if you are targeting anyone with hate speech." pic.twitter.com/Bqj6TQOGwP
Free speech and hate speech… getting closer and closer
Hate speech, didn’t kill Charlie Kirk. A hate filled person did.
neither are illegal nor should be. And judging by people’s reaction to this, I don’t think anyone can agree on what hate speech is so this doesn’t even work. Pam stop the nonsense.
This type nonsense happens after every tragedy. People think… we need the government to do something. No, we don’t. They’ll just make it worse.
Hate speech, didn’t kill Charlie Kirk. A hate filled person did.
neither are illegal nor should be. And judging by people’s reaction to this, I don’t think anyone can agree on what hate speech is so this doesn’t even work. Pam stop the nonsense.
This type nonsense happens after every tragedy. People think… we need the government to do something. No, we don’t. They’ll just make it worse.
I don’t like this shit man, she’s advocating for people getting fired also, I spoke up about a fed ex worker who got fired for mocking George Floyd’s death at a protest and I thought that was wrong too. I thought it was wrong of him to do and hateful but I thought it was wrong of fed ex to fire him. It had nothing to do with his job performance, he wasn’t representing the company in any way, why should he be fired?
it just reminds me of China social credit score shit. And in a slightly unrelated topic that worries me is cashless society, I worry about them pushing harder and harder for it so companies like visa can further restrict our rights by threatening what we can and can’t buy, sounds crazy but they’re one of the biggest pushers of internet censorship right now
"Employers, you have an obligation to get rid of people who are saying horrible things.” - Pam Bondi
curious your opinion about the firing thing, maybe there’s another angle to it I’m not considering, they are private businesses after all and free to do what they want, but it just doesn’t seem right to me at all and seems like a slippery slope
I don’t like this shit man, she’s advocating for people getting fired also, I spoke up about a fed ex worker who got fired for mocking George Floyd’s death at a protest and I thought that was wrong too. I thought it was wrong of him to do and hateful but I thought it was wrong of fed ex to fire him. It had nothing to do with his job performance, he wasn’t representing the company in any way, why should he be fired?
it just reminds me of China social credit score shit. And in a slightly unrelated topic that worries me is cashless society, I worry about them pushing harder and harder for it so companies like visa can further restrict our rights by threatening what we can and can’t buy, sounds crazy but they’re one of the biggest pushers of internet censorship right now
"Employers, you have an obligation to get rid of people who are saying horrible things.” - Pam Bondi
curious your opinion about the firing thing, maybe there’s another angle to it I’m not considering, they are private businesses after all and free to do what they want, but it just doesn’t seem right to me at all and seems like a slippery slope
I was the steward for an employee that got in trouble for social media stuff outside of UPS. It was interesting.
Basically they just wanted the employee to take their post down, but UPS's problem with it revolved around the fact that the employee's other posts online included the UPS logo and the driver in work uniforms.
Basically, since they were broadcasting their employment to the world, the rest of their actions on the account could reflect on the company.
I would want to see more details about the Fedex thing.
I was the steward for an employee that got in trouble for social media stuff outside of UPS. It was interesting.
Basically they just wanted the employee to take their post down, but UPS's problem with it revolved around the fact that the employee's other posts online included the UPS logo and the driver in work uniforms.
Basically, since they were broadcasting their employment to the world, the rest of their actions on the account could reflect on the company.
I would want to see more details about the Fedex thing.
Interesting… so in your scenario the post the employee made that was controversial but didn’t include ups logos, but their other posts did?
im not sure how I feel in that scenario, I can see both sides, what was your opinion on it?
here’s a link on the fed ex thing, you can see the picture in there he’s just wearing regular street clothes, I believe the internet just did their thing and tracked him down and found where he worked
his friend also got fired but he was a corrections officer, I can maybe see the reasoning there given the “conflict of interest” and being a government job or whatever but I don’t know I really don’t like the fed ex one and I don’t think it’s right and I think it’s a slippery slope
