When they see how many drivers they can get away with losing the rest will have no choice about it.
Will it be based on seniority or first come first serve?
Or time spent kneeling under the CM's desk?
Imagine applying for this getting approved for a date, a couple months down the road, and then the company finding a reason to fire you in between thus eliminating you from getting your buyout.
Surely they would never do something like that? Right?
Perfectly fine if you’re not voting for him, but the slate that’s going to run against him as a joke.
What are they going to change and what are they going to fix?
Voting for a different slate simply because you’re voting against the other slate is a really bad idea.
I have no problem with a direct challenge from a competent challenger.
This time there isn’t one that’s unfortunate, but that’s the truth.
Hooker is going to get us $250k buyouts AND bring turkeys back.
“ The UPS Workforce Transition Governance Committee has the discretion to determine the eligibility of each person. Certain people may be excluded from the program due to their current job responsibilities. Each decision made by the UPS Workforce Transition Governance
Committee is final.”
this is likely a very large reason for the lawsuit from the Teamsters. Absolutely no input and no control. Can’t say I blame them. I don’t trust the company to administer these things fairly or equitably.
As long as I get mine
Screw everyone else.
Blah blah the IBT doesn’t want them to be Union. Blah blah blah blah blah
Dat shit cray
Da fuck is that ?
I understand how that would be hard for you to identify considering it's been 15 years since you got any vagina
I understand how that would be hard for you to identify considering it's been 15 years since you got any vagina
💥
I understand how that would be hard for you to identify considering it's been 15 years since you got any vagina
Log in to reply.
