System maintenance completed. Please clear your browser cache and log in again.

Post history

View previous revisions and diffs for this post.
Hide history
Edited 1d ago by thebrownblob
@gumbysmom said ↗I don’t know I can’t think right now, maybe open up the transfer options to drivers outside of local , yes, that will be complicated. The whole air-conditioning scam is embarrassing.The West has transfers and I agree with you that would be nice and I hate article 40 with a passion. I certainly understand not wanting transfers, though, because there would be just as many pissed off members who had someone transfer dovetailing that had more seniority than them bumpingbumming them down the list.Again, I don’t know what that has to do with these buyouts. Nobody said the Union’s perfect. The idea here is though collectively bargaining for anything is always smarter than trying to do it by yourself. If anything this 9.5 issue has shown me we didn’t ask for enough penalty because it’s still cheaper for them to pay us this money then to hire people. I wonder what kind of buyout we could get if we collectively tried to get them for the top people. as well as demanding some sort of guarantees that help the people left behind? 🤔
Rendered before/after
Before
I don’t know I can’t think right now, maybe open up the transfer options to drivers outside of local , yes, that will be complicated. The whole air-conditioning scam is embarrassing.

The West has transfers and I agree with you that would be nice and I hate article 40 with a passion.

I certainly understand not wanting transfers, though, because there would be just as many pissed off members who had someone transfer dovetailing that had more seniority than them bumming them down the list.

Again, I don’t know what that has to do with these buyouts. Nobody said the Union’s perfect. The idea here is though collectively bargaining for anything is always smarter than trying to do it by yourself.

If anything this 9.5 issue has shown me we didn’t ask for enough penalty because it’s still cheaper for them to pay us this money then to hire people.

I wonder what kind of buyout we could get if we collectively tried to get them for the top people. as well as demanding some sort of guarantees that help the people left behind? 🤔

After
I don’t know I can’t think right now, maybe open up the transfer options to drivers outside of local , yes, that will be complicated. The whole air-conditioning scam is embarrassing.

The West has transfers and I agree with you that would be nice and I hate article 40 with a passion.

I certainly understand not wanting transfers, though, because there would be just as many pissed off members who had someone transfer dovetailing that had more seniority than them bumping them down the list.

Again, I don’t know what that has to do with these buyouts. Nobody said the Union’s perfect. The idea here is though collectively bargaining for anything is always smarter than trying to do it by yourself.

If anything this 9.5 issue has shown me we didn’t ask for enough penalty because it’s still cheaper for them to pay us this money then to hire people.

I wonder what kind of buyout we could get if we collectively tried to get them for the top people. as well as demanding some sort of guarantees that help the people left behind? 🤔