System maintenance completed. Please clear your browser cache and log in again.

Post history

View previous revisions and diffs for this post.
Hide history
Edited 4d ago by thebrownblob
@wally said ↗Not me, I've been through center merges where company union time ruled. It is what it is. People understand, "That guy was here longer". I believe in this very unique case, time in should rule. These guys put their time in, have seniority. Some guy with 10 less years bumping a senior driver is total bullsheetrock!Oh, come on now don’t play games. You’re just here to be a contrarian. If you were really worried about seniority you would’ve been complaining about the 30 and 40 year full-time inside employees that weren’t even given the opportunity to apply..but not one people about that out of youapply..
Rendered before/after
Before

Not me, I've been through center merges where company union time ruled. It is what it is. People understand, "That guy was here longer".

I believe in this very unique case, time in should rule. These guys put their time in, have seniority. Some guy with 10 less years bumping a senior driver is total bullsheetrock!


Oh, come on now don’t play games. You’re just here to be a contrarian. If you were really worried about seniority you would’ve been complaining about the 30 and 40 year full-time inside employees that weren’t even given the opportunity to apply..


After

Not me, I've been through center merges where company union time ruled. It is what it is. People understand, "That guy was here longer".

I believe in this very unique case, time in should rule. These guys put their time in, have seniority. Some guy with 10 less years bumping a senior driver is total bullsheetrock!


Oh, come on now don’t play games. You’re just here to be a contrarian. If you were really worried about seniority you would’ve been complaining about the 30 and 40 year full-time inside employees that weren’t even given the opportunity to apply..but not one people about that out of you